PLATFORM · COMPARISON · 12 CAPABILITIES
Where Navitrak does what bundled hardware-vendor BAS doesn't.
A capability comparison against the generic pattern of a hardware-vendor-bundled BAS. The competitor column is intentionally unnamed — the comparison is about architectural posture, not about a specific vendor. The compact eight-row version of this comparison appears on the Home page; the full twelve-row table is below.
| Capability | Navitrak | Bundled hardware-vendor BAS |
|---|---|---|
| Live force / energy / % rated on every fender, every second engineering evidence | ||
| Ask the operational history a question in plain English explainability | ||
| Build your own alert workflows — drag-and-drop, 25 blocks alert builder | Hard-coded; vendor-coded changes | |
| Multi-sensor fusion at the data layer, not just the screen data architecture | Visualization-deep only | |
| Runs in any browser, on any device thin client | Vendor-locked installed client | |
| Bring your own hardware — neutral across all 5 sensor types vendor-agnostic | Locked to the vendor's bundle | |
| Audit-grade Operation Report, auto-generated per event reporting | Manual log compilation | |
| Tender-ready evidence framework as a procurement reference reference spec | Vendor-specific spec | |
| Indefinite operational history retention total recall | Site-server-bounded, lossy export | |
| Per-vessel peak compression tracking across visits site mooring policy | Per-event only | |
| Cybersecurity posture — industrial controls + maritime risk coverage ISA/IEC 62443 | Variable by vendor; rarely audited | |
| Multi-berth orchestration from a single instance operations | Per-berth deployment, no shared records |